La’Raye Francisco
February 23, 2020
Reel Food and World Cinema
Soylent
Green
In the article, Laurel
Foster talks about how food can be a metaphor for social concerns. “These mass,
international mean of producing and distributing foods have been a factor in
global food concerns regarding surpluses in some nations and food shortages in
others, with no politically satisfactory means of ensuring the obvious equality
of food supply.” In the film, soylent green does just that. The actual food, Soylent
Green plays a huge role in the film. The food, and the lack of food, shows the
characters’ status in terms of class. In the movie, the characters’ economic
status played a part in what kind of food they had access to. Those who were rich
were able to obtain healthy and fresh foods. For example, they would eat things
like lettuce, beef, tomatoes, and celery. While the poor people were stuck eating
soylent green. There is an immense lack of resources for those who are not
rich.
Foster makes another good
point in her article. She talks about how many are vulnerable due to ‘outside
social, cultural, and technological forces.’ She mentions how that things which
are seen may not be what they truly are. “What is visible regarding foodstuffs
may conceal deliberate or unavoidable toxins and impurities hidden within.” The
big secret in Soylent Green was that soylent green was made from deceased
remains.
I could not even fathom
what I would do if I were in a situation such as the characters that were in
Soylent Green. People had no homes, they slept in the stairwells, there was no real
food for those who were considered poor and living in poverty, and overall,
they were unknowingly eating deceased people’s remains. I guess if I were to be
put into that situation, I would attempt to stop eating and find something else
to eat, if this were an option. I hope that I would never be put in a situation
where my only options are to eat people or starve to death.Poverty, lies, and desperation. What would you do?

Comments
Post a Comment